The World, Different Perspectives
1BB34097-F786-44E7-9A1A-E8A05C0914DBCreated with sketchtool.
BurgerCreated with Sketch.
The World, Different Perspectives
1BB34097-F786-44E7-9A1A-E8A05C0914DBCreated with sketchtool.
BurgerCreated with Sketch.
anothermaleid4 months ago

The World, Different Perspectives

    • Report this story folder
The World, Different Perspectives
ic-spinnerCreated with Sketch.
Everyone has a story to tell
Find the best stories to read and people to follow. Get inspired and start writing great stories yourself or with your friends. Share and let the world know.

Kenyan Court Nullifies Order to Shut Refugee Camp

The High Court of Kenya has asked the country’s government to halt the closure of the Dadaab refugee complex, which was set up in 1991 for families fleeing a conflict-ridden Somalia. In 2011, when the crisis reached its peak, the camp housed around 500,000 people. Now, it holds around 260,000 refugees, mostly of Somali origin. Some have spent more than two decades in the complex.

Want to be a co-author?
Request co-authorship ▸

The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) runs the Dadaab complex, and it depends on foreign donors for finances to fund its operations. Dadaab remains the largest complex in the world to house refugees. It is divided into five satellite camps – Ifo Main, Ifo 2, Dagahaley, Hagadera and Kambioos.

An aerial view of the Dagahaley satellite camp - Thomas Mukoya - Reuters

Who Wants the Camps to Close?

Last year, the Kenyan government issued a directive to shut the Dadaab complex. There were plans to forcibly send Somali refugees back to their home country, but then the deadline for shutting the camps down received an extension until May this year.

While a high court judge has referred to the government’s decision as an act of group persecution, the government is keen on appealing the ruling on grounds of security. A section believes that the camps have become safe havens for nefarious activities that affect the lives of Kenyans at large.

Eric Kiraithe, a Kenyan government spokesperson, said, “The camp had lost its humanitarian nature and had become a haven for terrorism and other illegal activities. The lives of Kenyans matter. Our interest in this case, and in the closure of Dadaab refugee camp, remains to protect the lives of Kenyans.”

Mwenda Njoka, a spokesperson for the country’s ministry of interior, said, “Our reasons for closing the camp are still valid. The camps are still a haven for terrorists. We intend to appeal the ruling.”

Who Does Not Want the Camps to Close?

When the Kenyan government issued its directive of shutting the Dadaab complex, the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights and Kituo Cha Sheria, a lobby group, challenged the decision in court. They claimed it was discriminatory and divergent from international law.

In his ruling, Judge John Mativo said, “The government's decision specifically targeting Somali refugees is an act of group persecution, illegal discriminatory and therefore unconstitutional.” He also called the orders arbitrary, excessive and disproportionate.

Muthoni Wanyeki from Amnesty International has welcomed the court’s decision, saying it affirms the legal obligation Kenya has toward protecting people already on its soil. On the day of the ruling, he said in a statement, “Today is a historic day for more than a quarter of a million refugees who were at risk of being forcefully returned to Somalia, where they would have been at serious risk of human rights abuses.”

What Comes Next?

After the high court’s ruling, Somalis in Kenya had two reasons to celebrate. The first was that the Dadaab complex was not closing and the second was that Somalia elected a new president. Popular favorite Mohamed Farmajo began his term in office on February 8, and many hope he will bring about the changes that Somalia needs. For now though, all eyes are on what comes of the Kenyan government’s appeal against the high court ruling.

Swiss Man’s Tattooed Skin Will Be Preserved as Art

Tim Steiner, a 40-year-old former tattoo parlor manager from Switzerland, has an elaborate tattoo spread across his back. After he dies, he will be skinned, and the tattoo will be framed and hung in a private collection.

Want to be a co-author?
Request co-authorship ▸

According to a BBC report, it all started 10 years ago, when Steiner’s then-girlfriend met Wim Delvoye, who, even at that time, was a controversial artist. Delvoye asked her if knew someone who would work for him as a human canvas. She called Steiner to ask him if he was interested, and his spontaneous response was, “I'd like to do that.”

The project involved 40 hours of tattooing, and was in the making for two years. The design has a Madonna at the heart of it, crowned by a Mexican-style skull and surrounded with swooping swallows and children riding koi fish. Delvoye did not forget to sign the artwork.

Tim – © Wim Delvoye

To Steiner, the tattoo titled “Tim” is “the ultimate art form.” He feels that “Tattooers are incredible artists who've never really been accepted in the contemporary art world. Painting on canvas is one thing, painting on skin with needles is a whole other story.”

In 2008, Rik Reinking, a German art collector, bought the artwork for around $160,000 (€150,000), of which Steiner received one-third. The contract requires Steiner to exhibit the tattoo in a gallery at least three times a year. Steiner does not find this arrangement as odd, saying “The work of art is on my back, I'm just the guy carrying it around. My skin belongs to Rik Reinking now.” Upon his death, the skin on Steiner’s back will make it to Reinking's personal art collection — framed and hung.

To those who find idea morbid, Steiner says, “Gruesome is relative.” He refers to it being an old concept in the tattoo history of Japan, adding that “If it's framed nicely and looks good, I think it's not such a bad idea.” Then, there are reports that a black market for tattooed skins still exists in Japan.

The first time he displayed his back as an exhibit was in June 2006, in Zurich, at which point the tattoo was not quite complete. He spent almost the entire last year at the Museum of Old and New Art (Mona) in Australia, which has been his longest exhibition to date. During his stint in the Land Down Under, he was on display five hours a day, six days a week. This appearance came to a close on January 31.

At work, sitting as a display, Steiner does not react when people talk to him. He says, “Many people think I'm a sculpture, and have quite a shock once they find out I'm actually alive.” He acknowledges the importance of Delvoye’s name linked to the project, saying, “If the name Wim Delvoye was not attached to this tattoo, it would have no artistic relevance.”

You've read the story folder
Story cover
written by
Writer avatar
A poet at heart, a passenger otherwise. Trying to make it through the big bad wonderful world, penning whatever catches my fancy.